Showing posts with label Samajwadi Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Samajwadi Party. Show all posts

Monday, August 5, 2013

Don't forget on your success.... Power & Politics/The Sunday Standard/ August 04, 2013



Don't Forget on your Success Depends Survival of Young Leadership Experiment


Dear Akhilesh,


I’m sure you are well aware that a large number of young voters are feeling betrayed. The diabolic suspension of Durga Shakti Nagpal, a young, brilliant IAS officer, for taking on the sand mafia has unmasked the dark side of your administration. Political vendettas, humiliation of civil servants, threatening abuse from Samajwadi Party satraps and the brutal killings of political leaders have marred your personal image. You still come across as one of the country’s most affable chief ministers. But your government is perceived as the most chaotic in India. It is one lacking an assertive leader. You may have fulfilled your promise to give young voters free laptops with Internet connections. But they aren’t able to reconcile your modern mind with your government’s autocratic actions. When you took over two years ago, the 180 million people of Uttar Pradesh saw in India’s youngest Chief Minister a catalyst for change.
I have seen you grow up in the Yadav clan, dominated by caste considerations. Your father Mulayam Singh Yadav sent you to tony schools and also abroad for better education in the hope that you would turn out to be the game-changer for the parivar and the state. He made you the SP state president to lead the party in the Assembly elections. You cycled through the dust and heat of the caste-ridden, communally volatile state. Your red cap, black waistcoat and bicycle became the symbol of change, which the voters were looking forward to. You proved wrong the elitist propagandists—who were pitching for a coalition government—by winning a record number of seats any regional party has ever won in Uttar Pradesh. Just a few weeks before the elections, when I interviewed you for my show Teekhi Baat for IBN7, you were surprised about being given such prominence. My media colleagues laughed at my choice of the 38-year-old budding politician who would never make it to chief minister’s chair. Soon, they had to eat their words and chase you for interviews. You were candid and assertive. You assured viewers that you wouldn’t allow party cadres to dictate terms to the government. You promised to erase the SP’s goonda raj image in the state and that civil servants would be given full freedom from interference. Finally, you vowed that if voted to absolute power, your party would follow growth-driven policies. Not only Uttar Pradesh but also the entire country was expecting a marvellous model of modern governance from the youngest chief minister of India’s most populous state. Sadly, you have now been compelled to forget your promises and stick to the conventional politics of patronage. Like another young chief minister, Jammu and Kashmir’s Omar Abdullah, you were also chosen to lead the state in a midnight operation. Omar, by his pathetic performance, has proved beyond doubt that dynastic succession doesn’t ensure success in governance. But you were expected to justify dynastic politics by excelling in delivery and not retain the hidden traits of feudal machinations.
The past 17 months seem to have taken a toll not only on your political acumen but also on your determination to deliver on promises. Though your ascension was a hereditary transition of power from a father to a son, it was meant to change the direction, dialogue and the development tapestry of the state. Soon after you took over, some Samajwadi goons went on a rampage—attacking officials, extracting ransom from innocents and grabbing land. Suddenly, an Akhilesh Sena comprising lumpen elements had popped up, which started to threaten opponents with violence. You disbanded it quickly and ordered some of them arrested.
Unfortunately, it is the only visible action you have taken as chief minister. Since then, your ability and credibility seem to have eroded. Sometimes, your own admirers compare you with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh who is in the chair but not in power. Unlike other SP leaders, you still enjoy a clean image. You haven’t promoted factionalism within the party, but you haven’t acted against the dirty politics which is destroying your image either. Your ministers and party leaders openly abuse civil servants, patronise dons and mafias and help illegal commercial activities. You are told that the bureaucracy is out to destabilise your government by creating caste and communal tensions. Your counsellors are taking advantage of SP’s multiple power centres. Many decisions taken in the morning are reversed by the evening by other ‘unknown’ powers. Recently, the transfers of over a dozen senior officials ordered and approved by you were put in abeyance as soon as you took off from Lucknow for an official visit to the south. These nefarious forces have taken full advantage of your silence and inaction for their deeds and misdeeds. They haven’t allowed you to declare your agenda for governance. Your government hasn’t been able to attract any major investments. It hasn’t started any new infrastructure projects. The ‘cabal that shall not be named’ has made you a captive chief minister who is unwilling to disrupt the existing power structure. It is because of this scary scenario that many senior and excellent civil servants posted at the Centre and other states are unwilling to stay in UP. Bureaucrats in your state are unwilling to take decisions and have stopped processing even normal administrative files. Most of your MLAs and MPs, while appreciating your anguish, are disillusioned by your inaction and indifference. They feel that you are now a reluctant chief minister who is willing to compromise but not fight. Don’t forget that leaders of your age group have a bigger stake in the state’s future than the old netas who have won by dividing people and not socially and economically empowering them. Don’t forget that in your success depends the survival of the Young Leadership experiment. Your failure will only ensure the perpetuation of the old and tired leadership.
(Follow me on Twitter @PrabhuChawla. Or, email: prabhuchawla@newindianexpress.com)

Monday, April 1, 2013

Teekhi Baat with Mulayam Singh Yadav/March 31, 2013, IBN7


'We will not withdraw support; UPA themselves will hold elections in November'






With his now-on-now-off threat to withdraw support to the UPA Government, Samajwadi Party president Mulayam Singh Yadav has kept the Congress-led government on tenterhooks. Yadav spoke  on the DMK, the Congress, his support to the UPA Government, Sonia Gandhi, the Uttar Pradesh Government and host of other issues during Teekhi Baat on IBN7. Excerpts:
You said Congress is a traitor party, but you’ve been supporting it for the past eight years.
Karunanidhi joined the government, following which one minister of his party was framed and sent to jail. He said that he would spill the beans and stated that it was not his decision (2G spectrum auction) alone; others were party to it too.
Who are they?
Let them be anybody, they know it. He will say it on his own, at some time he may have to say it before the court. In the same manner, we saved their government when they were facing hard times. If we had not, it would not have stayed till today.
In 2008, if you would not have saved the government...
As soon as we extended support, they let loose the CBI on me. They are using the CBI and income tax department to run the government. They betray the ones who support them.

They betrayed the DMK and you; that is what you say. 
Others too have been betrayed by them.
Till now, only you have been betrayed, with CBI, income tax.
They put Karunanidhi’s daughter and their minister in jail.
You feel Congress fixed them?
How else? The government has fixed them.
Did they purposely do it and why?
How can it happen by mistake? Who has control over the CBI and income tax department?
Why did they do it?
So that people support them out of fear.
They do so because they want support of Mulayam Singh.
If I had fear, I would not have spoken out openly.
Do you think the Congress is not a party that can be trusted?
It was never a party that one could trust.
Even then you support it?
It is due to our principles that we are against communal forces.
Elections are next year in May.
It’ll not be in May, but before that.
You say elections will happen earlier.
They will be in November.
Congress spokesperson said “if we are traitors, then why are they supporting traitors?”
If they have said, the party will think about it.
You mean you are not in the mood to withdraw support.
We are not withdrawing support now.
Not in this session?
No.
You were saying elections would be held in November but you won’t withdraw support in this session. How is that possible?
They themselves will hold elections in November.
You are tough sometimes and weak sometimes. People say you are wheeling-dealing clandestinely, like you took a tough stand on Beni Prasad Verma, demanding his resignation, but kept quiet later.
Soniaji today is a big leader of a big party. She came to my chair. They have people who act in such a manner, and then their national president has to apologise. I did not like the fact Soniaji had to apologise because it was not her fault. Kamal Nath also criticised the comments and apologised.Soniaji told you with
folded hands and you supported Pranab Mukherjee;
Soniaji told you with folded hands and you withdrew your demand for his (Verma) removal from the Cabinet.
I didn’t want to act big. It was due to the large-heartedness of Soniaji that I agreed.
In Uttar Pradesh, you say that bureaucrats are not working. You put your son under pressure. He is your obedient educated son, don’t you think this curbs his freedom?
There is no check on his freedom.
It doesn’t seem he has full freedom, he has to ask his uncle, father etc.
Can I do this being a party president? We won because of our party’s principle and our stance against corruption. Hence, if I see faults happening, then it is my right to say it. Government is not above party, party is above government.
Will you make a Third Front?
That is automatically formed after elections.
Will it not be formed pre-poll?
It can’t be, as there would be feuds over tickets in that case.
How many seats would SP win?
Let elections be held today or late, we will win so many seats that government would not be formed without its support.
Will there be no prime minister from the SP ever?
How can this be said? The party may grow stronger in future.
SP can become so strong that it can stake claim to PM’s post.
That can happen if big parties support us, which they will not.
You’ll not take BJP’s support, Congress will not support you, then you will support Congress.
We will try for third front. Deve Gowdaji had become PM of third front government.
In 2014, the PM will neither be from the Congress nor the BJP.
Yes, from neither of them.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Teekhi Baat_Mulayam Singh Yadav on IBN7

With the political war for Uttar Pradesh raging by the day in the run up to the polls in the state, Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav speaks to IBN7 for Teekhi Baat . In a no holds barred interview, Yadav minces no words on her bête noire Mayawati, his stance on Muslim reservation, Samajwadi party’s blow hot – blow cold relationship with the Congress party, his relationship with Ajit Singh and about his son and party scion Akhilesh Yadav.

PC: Are you ready for elections

MS: Am fully prepared

PC: Are you or your son fighting elections, tell me the truth.

MS: Neither am I fighting, nor my son, we are making people contest elections.

PC: Which people are you making contest the election?

MS: My brother Satpal Singh will fight.

PC: Who is taking the leadership position in the election?

MS: Samajwadi Party

PC: It is being said that you have decided to rest a bit and let your son take the lead

MS: It is not so. Now the condition is not conducive for me to rest, neither have I gone weak, my health is all right.

PC: Many times decisions are taken from the heart, I have done too much, the politics of our times is over.

MS: I have not got fed up of politics as yet.

PC: Not fed up as yet.

MS: No, not fed up as yet.

PC: People say that Mulayam Singh had taken a decision of allowing Akhilesh take a lead because, Rahul Gandhi, son of Soniiaji Gandhi has come forward in these polls. So, to show that there is a fight between the sons in politics, you took this decision.

MS: This is not my opinion, thinking; neither do I want to get into this issue. Because when the son wanted to come into politics, Akhilesh, then I didn’t stop him, allowed him to be in politics. The result is that he has won Lok Sabha elections three times and I am happy he is elected from the area from where Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia was parliament member.

PC: Akhilesh has won from that area.

MS: Even I had won; I vacated the seat and made Akhilesh fight from the seat.

PC: What do you think, are there any issues in the UP elections, or it is only fought over individuals Mayawati, Mulayam Singh, Rahul Gandhi, there are no issues.

MS: No, there are issues. The first issue is that we will provide a clean government and administration. A clean government will be formed, and our priorities will be farmers, labour, poor people, unemployed, youth, students. Whether it be lawyers or traders, we will take everybody with us, give facilities to everybody, is the plan of our party.

PC: That Mulayam Singhji is saying from the start that everybody will be provided with facilities. But at present, is there any cleaner government than Mayawati’s who has removed all corrupt ministers, 15 of them.

MS: That is why the issue is raised, people have realized in their heart, they are fed up now, that the leaders have become corrupt. This fact has been proved by the chief minister who runs the Uttar Pradesh government.

PC: But the chief minister is at least taking action. No sooner the Lokayukta report comes out, she removes corrupt ministers.

MS: It is not action, it is posturing.

PC: Can removing 15 ministers be called posturing. Have you ever removed ministers on charges of corruption, even then there were allegations of corruption?

MS: During our period, there were no allegations.

PC: Are you saying there were no allegations?

MS: If there were allegations levelled against our ministers, we would have not tolerated it even for a day. Now, elections have come near, and they want to show that they are not doing any corruption. They want to show that when they found their people being corrupt, they punished them. The root of corruption is Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister.

PC: Have you started any movement against her.

MS: Those removed were unfairly punished, those were the ones who were earning money and giving (to Mayawati).

PC: She says that

MS: Now please tell me, she had kept Kushwah at her residence. She removed Kushwaha, he was staying at her residence. Why any chief minister keep a minister at her residence?

PC: Many ministers are sitting at her residence every day, in addition to Kushwaha many other also sit at her residence. That is her style of working.

MS: She used Kushwaha, collected (money) by keeping him at her residence; he was the most trustworthy. Now what happened, there must have been a fight over a share of the spoils. People say that there has been a fight over a sharing of the spoils.

PC: There has been a fight over the sharing of the spoils?

MS: It is over sharing of the spoils.

PC: That is why he was removed

MS: That is why he was removed

PC: Now BJP inducted him

MS: Now BJP is looking if they get anybody, somehow to win. Now it has become a weak party, the leaders are not happy, now they are inducting whomsoever they get.

PC: The question is that BSP people, they allege that you are not able to tolerate a dalit woman. Like how a dalit woman became the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, and she is proving tough on everyone, Congress, BJP, Samajwadi Party.

MS: So, should we stop fighting elections and wind up our party. Are we sadhu sanyasis

PC: One woman has troubled you all

MS: Even Indiraji was a woman.

PC: Then all had come together against her, when Jaiprakashji’s movement started, even you were with him against Indiraji.

MS: It is true, when I saw that dictatorship is dawning upon the country, then we fought against dictatorship with bravery. We were in jail for 19-20 months. And a very dangerous emergency was in force and we fought it, we saved democracy that time. Indiraji had demolished democracy, and forced dictatorship. And it is not a small thing to fight against dictatorship in those times.

PC: You opposed when Indira Gandhi’s Congress brought about dictatorship, which you opposed. I will ask you later about what relations you have with Congress now. Now, I am talking about UP elections, in UP elections, it seems that except for the issue of castes, clan, there is no other election issue.

MS: No Samajwadi party is not into clan and corruption. It is a clean party, there was never a taint on our party.

PC: There is no election issue of corruption there, you people are raking the issues of clan and caste.

MS: How can you say that caste is an issue.

PC: Reservation is being made into an issue.

MS: When we are Samajwadis, and have Samajwadi party, and Samajwadi people don’t believe in caste and clan.

PC: Now you spoke about reservations, that there should be reservation for Muslims. Congress said that Mulayam Singh is not saying anything, how much reservation should be there. Congress said it should be four per cent, you said it is less. Hence you did not make any definitive points about Muslim reservation. You are just saying that reservation should be provided, in Lokpal, in government jobs, you don’t talk of development.

MS: Now we have spoken the most on reservation which has influenced people greatly, we said that there should be 18 per cent reservation for Muslims, instead of 15 per cent. For so many years, the Muslims have remained backward, now it can be reversed when there is 18 per cent reservation for them.

PC: Will you write this in your manifesto

MS: Yes, if our government is voted to power we will give 18 per cent reservation for Muslims.

PC: Why didn’t you provide reservation earlier?

MS: We have always fought for it.

PC: Fought, but did not provide

MS: No, now this is in hands of the central government.

PC: No, like Andhra Pradesh government provided reservation there.

MS: Where was our party alone in power, it was of different people. Many people were part, hence the government was formed. If our government is formed in UP, then with what authority we have and how much reservation we can be according to the laws and constitution, that facility we will give to Muslims.

PC: Hence you are saying that, if it is in your authority, you will give 18 per cent reservation in government jobs to Muslims.

MS: Yes, we will do.

PC: Now you have not announced it as yet.

MS: We have announced it, because they have gone backward, this we are not saying, all the commissions which have been formed by the Congress government have said that. And the report of the commissions have been received by the Congress government, let it be Ranganath Mishra or Sachchar Committee.

PC: Sachchar sahab has recommended

MS: Sachchar committee has recommended. Let the recommendation be of 10 per cent of 15 per cent, I am not concerned with that. But one thing is true that they have done hard work, and found out how backward Muslims have become. And it went to the extent that Muslims became even more backward than dalits, this is written in Sachchar committee report.

PC: Mulayamsinghiji, Sachchar has written that, you are demanded that Muslims should be given 18 per cent reservation. But the Constitution has mandated that reservation should not be more than 50 per cent, then from where would be carve out this 18 per cent.

MS: This is an excuse, the constitution can be amended.

PC: No, it is the Supreme Court’s judgement that reservation cannot be more than 50 per cent.

MS: Now Supreme Court did that, but if the parliament wants, it can amend, the court has not prohibited amendment. Supreme Court has not prohibited amendments by Lok Sabha.

PC: So, can do more than 50 per cent reservation if a government is formed with your help at the centre.

MS: We will certainly do 15 per cent, and will make efforts to make it 18 per cent.

PC: It will be more than 50 per cent, if 27 per cent backward, 18 per cent Muslims, 11-12 per cent scheduled castes, scheduled tribes will take it to 60 per cent.

MS: We will certainly do 14 -15 per cent reservation.

PC: Even by giving 14 per cent reservation, it will be more than 50 per cent.

MS: For taking it up to 18 per cent, we will pass a resolution in the assembly, and we will tell the central government to pass an amendment.

PC: Hence you agree that you do politics, to remain in power in the name of reservation. You demand votes in the name of reservation, whether it be Muslims, or backward, or harijan.

MS: This is wrong. When I was in seventh class I had had food at the house of a backward class and I was banished in social circles for doing that. And in ninth class, I had food at the house of a Jatav, for which I was banished from social circles again, for one month. Hence, I am fighting from the time I was a child.

PC: Mulayam Singh, you never said that there should be reservation for poor, whether he be Muslim or Hindu, Sikh, Christian or backward or scheduled caste. Hence, it seems there should be no reservation or poor people.

MS: I have demanded 10 per cent reservation for upper class poor, in the assembly. And we passed a resolution to the effect and sent it to the government at the centre.

PC: Hence reservation should be for poor people in upper castes, and rich people in other caste.

MS: That is there in the constitution.

PC: That means if anybody is scheduled caste, scheduled tribe, backward, rich people belonging to those castes will get the benefit of reservation.

MS: They are backward.

PC: Why everywhere you don’t have reservation

MS: They have suffered, had no respect in society, and there is poverty, and I have no objection against the ones who have moved ahead. They have to go ahead. But those who have got left behind, should get special opportunity.

PC: Apply income criteria on backward, Muslim, that people above certain income should not get reservation.

MS: This you have to understand, even if people from backward class are rich, but he does not get as much respect, as people from upper caste.

PC: It means that the politics of reservation will go on in this country.

MS: No it is not mere politics of reservation. It is about farmers, jobless people, let them be of any caste. In are Kanyadaan scheme, we had made no distinction on basis of caste, all were given benefit.

PC: On development indicators, Mayawati did a lot of development in UP, made good roads, made statues, but made good parks.

MS: If roads have been built, do a survey, they have been made during our governments time. This government has made no road in five years. Those which have been made, have been destroyed in six months. And even after nine years, the roads made during are tenure are in good shape.

PC: In nine years, four years you were in power.

MS: Out government lasted for quarter to four years. And for five years the present government is running. Now see the roads made by us during our tenure, they are still in good shape.

PC: If your government and politics was good, then why people left you, like Ajit Singh,

MS: Nobody left. Don’t ask me where he goes how and why.

PC: But why you had taken him if you know how many times he goes here and there.

MS: No, we had majority, but he wanted to join us and the love that Chaudhary saab had for us, he made us go ahead, hence it was in my mind that he (Ajit Singh) is his son. I said that he is the son of our leader, hence let him say anything, I will not reply, will give him respect. Hence, for keeping his respect, we kept him (Ajit Singh)with us.

PC: He betrayed you.

MS: Now say it was betrayal or say he went away.

PC: You have no presence in western Uttar Pradesh, you took him so that you can get some votes. You used to depend on him, he did not depend on you.

MS: Now we are not depending on him. And we will not talk about him because he is the son of our leader. If I start saying then there are many things, but I will not say.

PC: Even Rashid Alvi, he was an old timer with you.

MS: When somebody gave Rajya Sabha seat, he left. Earlier he was offered Rajya Sabha, he left, again he got Rajya Sabha seat, he left again. Now, this is betrayal.

PC: Do you think you will get majority.

MS: Certainly, Samajwadi Party will get majority in elections.

PC: But people say you did not project whether Mulayam Singh will become Chief Minister or Akhilesh will become one.

MS: Everybody in the party knows who will become.

PC: Even you tell.

MS: Why should I tell, our whole party worker base knows that who will become chief minister.

PC: It means you have decided who will become chief minister.

MS: The people know.

PC: I am not asking the name, but your party has decided who will become.

MS: It is not decided in our party, it is understood.

PC: It is understood that Mulayam Singh will become.

MS: Laughs

PC: Nobody other than him can become

MS: That is dependent upon the MLA’s.

PC: Now you are saying MLA’s, earlier you were saying the party has decided. But don’t you feel after many years, in the UP elections, Samajwadi Party has not stars campaigning, no businessmen. Does Mulayam Singh feel it was a fault to get stars and ask votes for you, now only you are asking for votes?

MS: The wishes of the real stars are with Samajwadi party.

PC: Earlier they used to come for voting, they were also you brand ambassadors.

MS: Then I was not alone, there were other people, because of them they used to come and go.

PC: You used to call, hence they used to come. Now you have no need of Amitabh Bachchan, Anil Ambani.

MS: Amitabh Bachchanji has left politics. Hence I will not comment, there will be very few people like Amitabh Bachchan, I know him.

PC: His good wishes are with you.

MS: His good wishes are there, I don’t want to trap him into the political world. But people like him are few in the country.

PC: Let me ask you straight, let say he was Karan, or Arjun, but you are missing Amar Singhiji in the elections.

MS: Now that he had gone, he has gone.

PC: No, he used to help a lot in elections.

MS: Yes he used to help in elections.

PC: Now you may be missing his presence.

MS: Now I have left it to the people, the people will help us.

PC: No, the people will help, but aren’t you missing him.

MS: I will appeal to people, that I have no money, earlier Amar Singh used to collect, which is true.

PC: Amar Singh used to collect.

MS: He used to collect, he used to take donations, he used to be of big help for the party.

PC: Hence you use to depend on him.

MS: Now we are appealing that the people will make our candidates fight elections. I have no money, nor my party, hence you (the people) will make them fight elections. The people will make our candidates fight, I have full faith in the people.

PC: Earlier it used to be said in discussions that Samajwadi Party is a party of big businessmen, capitalists, now it has become real Samajwadi party.

MS: Even then the party was not in the hands of big businessmen and capitalists. Amar Singh was not big businessman, he used to do some small business. He was not a big businessman.

PC: Till now you are with the Congress government which is in power, you are supporting Congress.

MS: That we are supporting, you know, we are doing that because, we have to stall communal forces.

PC: Now like Rahul said something about Akhilesh, hence you have enemity and friendship both. Hence, it can be labelled opportunism, as, BJP cannot come to power now, hence, your argument of stalling communal forces does not stand.

MS: Now we are supporting the Congress to stop the BJP from coming to power. It is true that the Congress is not doing good behaviour with us, but we are doing politics of principle. Hence, even if they don’t look after us, we stand by our principle.

PC: They keep on slapping you, even then you are standing with folded hands in front of them.

MS: No issues, they are against us.

PC: Then why are you supporting them.BJP government cannot be formed now in the centre, they have 114 MP’s how can their government be formed.

MS: No, no, there are parties supporting them.

PC: 150 total

MS: Not 150, it is more.

PC: 160, even if you add your 20, even there the government cannot be formed.

MS: No, no, it could have been formed. Many parties could have gone with them, I will not unnecessarily take their names and annoy them. Many parties could go with them.

PC: If you withdraw support, then the Congress government will fall, but the question is that you don’t want to make the government fall.

MS: Now why to make the government fall when the elections are coming near.

PC: Elections are in 2014.

MS: There are only two years left for 2014.

PC: Hence you will not withdraw support.

MS: No, we will not withdraw support.

PC: Till 2014, you will not withdraw support to the Congress

MS: Till 2014 will not withdraw support.

PC: Will you take their support to form a government in UP.

MS: Now we are fighting alone, Samajwadi Party is fighting elections alone on its own strength.

PC: If you don’t win majority

MS: The imaginary question that you have posed, what answer will I give to that.

PC: The condition is that you will not get majority.

MS: We are in such a position that we will get clear majority.

PC: Earlier, it (majority) did not come, so if it does not come this time, then Congress doors are open?

MS: This will be thought later, but we have full confidence that the people will give us clear majority.

PC: You can take anybody’s support, except BJP’s and BSP, to form government.

MS: We will get clear majority, hence we will not need anybody’s support.

PC: No, to keep communal forces out, you will help anybody to form the government.

MS: No, our government will be formed, it will be of Samajwadi party.

PC: This is a imaginary, that your government will be formed. Now I am asking another imaginary thing, if you don’t get majority, what you will do.

MS: We are among people and have understood that people will fully support Samajwadi Party.

PC: Now I ask you the last question, if you don’t get majority in the elections.

MS: We will get majority.

PC: If it (majority) does not come, will it be Akhilesh’s or your defeat.

MS: We will get majority.

PC: If it does not come, then whose defeat would it be, party’s or Akhilesh’s

MS: Then it will be our party’s.

PC: Let’s see, our good wishes are with you, thank you for coming to our studio.

MS: Thank you Prabhuji !

Monday, July 21, 2008

Interview with Amar Singh/India Today, July 28, 2008

"Mayawati, Modi, Advani more lethal than Bush"
The Samajwadi Party (SP) will contest the forthcoming elections under the leadership of Manmohan Singh, says general secretary Amar Singh.
Q. Why this change of heart—from angry Amar Singh to sweet Amar Singh?
A. There is no political change of heart. We have been constantly wedded to secularism and are firm about our political stance. We wanted to withdraw support but didn’t because we want to keep communalism at bay.
Q. You realised this only recently.
A. In spite of our differences with the Congress, we never withdrew support. I have never abused or attacked anyone, be it political or personal. We have mutually understood that attacking each other without any rhyme or reason will not benefit either of us. There is a convergence of political interest. So we have come together.
Q. In the last UNPA meeting, we saw a united face of the alliance in the morning, but by evening, things had changed.
A. In the meeting, I had endorsed the views expressed by Om Prakash Chautala and said that if need arises, we will meet Congress chief Sonia Gandhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. I also said that Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam was the right person to make a statement on the nuclear deal issue.
Q. It seems that you are using Dr Kalam’s name for your own convenience. You spoke against the deal on the floor of the House even after Dr Kalam had endorsed the deal in national interest. Isn’t that a volte face?
A. The UPA regime never consulted us, formally or informally. But after M.K. Narayanan approached us, we decided to consult a defence expert. And undoubtedly, Dr Kalam is far more knowledgeable than all of us on this issue.
Q. Earlier, you were misled by Prakash Karat on this issue.
A. I respect him. Their point of view on the Indo-US nuclear deal may be right from their own perspective and ideology. I did support them, but when I met Narayanan, and later our missile man and former president Kalam, we were forced to change our stance.
Q. You were not on talking terms with the Government. Suddenly they get in touch with you and seek support for the deal and you give it. Is this a permanent arrangement?
A. As far as the SP is concerned, we will not do anything to thwart our relations with the Congress leadership, be it at the national level or state level. Whether we will be able to forge an alliance with Congress, we are not too sure. If it happens it is fine, if it doesn’t, still in Rae Bareli and Amethi, we will give unconditional support to Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi.
Q. But critics say both of you are afraid of Mayawati.
A. Many people are saying that BJP is petrified of Manmohan Singh. Jaswant Singh approached UNPA leaders and asked them to support the BJP to oust the Congress-led Government. Isn’t this what we should call opportunism? If they do, it is politics. If I do it, I am called opportunistic.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Seedhi Baat with Amar Singh/Aajtak, July 13, 2008

Amar Singh has said that the UPA government will comfortably sail through the trial of strength in the Lok Sabha on July 22. "I won't reveal to you my strategy for saving the government, but I'm confident that we will get support of more than 290 MPs on the floor of the house", the Samajwadi Party General Secretary, told me in an interview for Aaj Tak. (Watch Video)
Singh, who was instrumental in making the leaderships of the Congress and the Samajwadi party bury and hatchet and form an alliance that could prove to be the lifeline for the UPA govermnment expressed the hope that the new tie-up would continue beyind the next Lok sabha elections. When asked whether his party would have an alliance with Congress in UP for next general election, Singh said, "We want to have pre-poll alliance with Congress in UP and won't field candidates against Congress at Raebarelly and Amethi. ." The constituencies are currently being represented in the Lok sabha by Sonia and rahul gandhi. But asked to choose between Manmohan singh, Sonia and Rahul gandhi for prime minister, he indicated the SP was quite content with the leadership of manmohan Singh. "We will cont elections under leadership of Manmohan singh who remains our candidate for prime ministershiop". he brushed aside sufggestions that he will take mup a cabinet portfolio after the government wins the trust vote.

Asked about reports that he was trying to work out a compromise between the fueding Ambani brothers and whether he had sought the prime minister's intervention in the matter, Singh, who is known to be close to the younger brother Anil, said he "was too small a fry" to intervene in such a matter. But he said it was in the national interest that the brothers forget the bitterness of the recent past and work together. "The cumulative wealth of Mukesh and anil combined is about five percent of the country's GDP and as such any fight between two such persons can only harm the country. I feel it is in the nation's interest if bitter fued is brought to an early end", he said.

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Impossible is nothing in race to power/Mail Today/July-07,2008

NECESSITY is the mother of all initiatives. Nine years ago, Sonia Gandhi’s office kept Amar Singh waiting for an appointment he had sought with her and he never forgave her. He persuaded Mulayam Singh to back out from apromise to back her for prime ministership on the fall of the Vajpayee government in 1999, and made nonsense of her famous “Igot 272” claim. Since then the two sides have been daggers drawn, both politically and personally. Yet, for the government’s survival, it was to the SP that the Congress leaders turned. All UPA alliance partners were kept in the dark about the parleys with the SP and the initial feelers were sent through Sonia’s political secretary Ahmed Patel, Amar’s good friend while the SP leader was holidaying in the US. The high command has been wary of engaging him directly due to Singh's aggressive nature and his ability to drive hard bargains. Not to speak of his unpredictable and his impulsive instincts. After the way they stood her up in 1999, Sonia could ill afford another slap from the same palm, which explains why she entered the scene only after the SP made its intentions public. The first sign of this was Amar Singh’s statement that “containing communalism was top most priority for the SP”. The ice melted, Sonia called Amar on phone and later he and Mulayam dropped by at 10 Janpath and the government is no longer in peril. PS: Though SP and BSP had earlier announced they no longer back the UPA, they never withdrew their letters of support given in 2004. As the Adidas ad says, "Impossible is Nothing” applies in politics too.

Monday, June 30, 2008

An offer with his hands tied/Power&Politics/Mail Today-June30,2008

AMONG President John FKennedy’s more famous exhortations was calling on Americans to “pay any price and bear any burden, support any friend, oppose any foe,” for the cause of liberty. The UPA leadership seems to be heeding his advice and appears ready to pay any price and bear any burden. The cause once again is liberty, but with a twist. Liberty from the Left. Iam talking about the latest flirtation between the Samajwadi Party and the Congress, which if it materialises will enable the Congress to rid itself of the baggage that is the Left. The question is: Can Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh come up with the kind of offer that Mulayam Singh Yadav and Amar Singh will find hard to refuse? For them, it's atough choice. If they do join, they have just awee bit to gain in the remaining tenure of this government, but much to lose. The SP is sure to be dumped by the UNPA, the backlash from the Muslim community, the SP’s core support group, could be catastrophic. The Congress offer has to be something that more than compensates for these losses. Will Manmohan, for example, be ready to give four or five Cabinet berths and afew junior ministers jobs to the SP, which with its 36 MPs, will become the second largest constituent in the UPA, if it chooses to join it? But Manmohan Singh is faced with arather ticklish problem. He is already presiding over the largest ever Council of Ministers with 74 members which is just about within the prescribed 15 per cent limit. His options are limited: He can either drop ministers from his party, which is relatively easy or ask smaller allies to vacate seats, which is alot more difficult. To save one deal, Manmohan Singh is weaving many smaller yet complex deals.