Monday, July 15, 2013
Teekhi Baat with Ajay Maken_IBN7_July 13, 2013
Friday, February 10, 2012
Teekhi Baat with Ajay Maken_Prabhu Chawla on IBN7/February 04, 2012
AM: In addition to being the union sports minister, am a party worker.
PC: Recently, you were hell bent on getting the sports bill. The way India is suffering in cricket, the name of India is affected, as it is known as the Indian team, though it comes under BCCI. Even in T20 the performance was poor, whom do you hold responsible, the players are being blamed, they were heroes, now they have become villains. But those who choose them are not held responsible, you also fear them, other people too fear them.
AM: No, no, it is not a question of fearing, if you look back in the recent history, then by the medium of sports bill, public statements, I spoke about bringing transparency in sports federations, including BCCI, which I don’t think had ever been done before. And I think that sports bodies, including BCCI should be under the ambit of the RTI Act and have transparency.
PC: But the bad manner in which we are losing matches now, who do you hold responsible for that. I am asking you teekhi baat, but you will not talk straight since you fear.
AM: I it nothing like I fear or something.
PC: Because, these were the players, who got us the world cup, T20, after that such mediocre performance, it seems they are tired.
AM: Please see, our players are best among the world players, there is no doubt about that. But the way these players are being managed. Consider, you are putting them under pressure to play commercial cricket by way of IPL. Hence, I think that Indian players are the ones who play the most matches in the world. In the whole world, any player of any country does not play so many matches. And most of these matches happen in India. Hence we have two bad effects of this, first is that they get tired, the second is that they only know to play in India and don’t get enough exposure abroad.
PC: Hence, you are saying that playing too much, that too only in India, affects their performance.
AM: Certainly. And when there are commercial matches, like IPL, the fees that they get for playing these matches is so much that even if the players are injured, they hide the injury and play the match. Hence, performance is affected when they play for India.
PC: Hence, the good players of India play commercial cricket, ignore their fitness.
AM: I don’t blame the players for this. Our players have an opportunity to earn fame and money. If we have so many good players, who have played for so many years and reached a level, we should not rob them of these opportunities. But administrators also have a responsibility, there are things that players cannot see and are also not scientifically equipped to see. Hence, the organizers, the BCCI, who organizes IPL, they should take precaution that a balance is maintained, hence they don’t get more than necessary exposure in India. And they should not be made to overplay in India our outside.
PC: Let me ask you in one sentence, don’t you think that overplaying affects performance.
AM: I have said, our players are overexposed, in India also they play the most matches. They are overexposed players. And they have to play may times in spite of being injured.
PC: And BCCI hides their injury many times you said.
AM: Yes, I have said, that when they foresee commercial benefit, and in the absence of any proper checking mechanism, they have to play forcibly. Hence, I don’t think they players are at fault here. I think that BCCI and the IPL organizers are at fault.
PC: But players can also say no to play these matches, saying that they cannot play so much.
AM: Please see, players don’t dare to say no. If players say no, then it would be difficult for them to get to play tests. The strength of the player is his game only, if he is not played in four matches, then there is nobody is encourage him. Hence, I believe that it is no fault of the players. Our players are the world best players. But it is the responsibility of the BCCI and IPL organizers, that players should not be made to play when they are injured and not overexpose them.
PC: You are saying we have the best players, but due to BCCI’s commercial interests, their performance is being affected.
AM: Certainly, I am saying this.
PC: You think they should be made to play less, or balanced.
AM: They must be made to play in balanced form. I have said that they have to be made to play in a balanced way.
PC: It means they must be made to play less commercial matches.
AM: Certainly, they should be made to play only those many commercial matches which do not have adverse impact on their fitness.
PC: Now you are saying that commercial matches are more and other ones are less.
AM: I think there should be a balance. It is not question of commercial more or less.
PC: You also fear players it seems, on the issue of commercial interest.
AM: I am not scared of players
PC: A player would be recognized as an Indian, he will not be known as a good player if he earns Rs. 10 crore, if he makes 10 more runs, he will be known as a good player
AM: I know under what conditions our players play and the kind of mental pressure on them of their sports federations. And how the player are scared every time that if they do something, this or that will happen and they will not be made to play in the next match.
PC: Hence they are being made to play forcibly.
AM: Certainly.
PC: There is a compulsion on them.
AM: Prabhuji, I am saying this.
PC: But you don’t have any role in this.
AM: Our government has no role in this. And in the whole world…
PC: They whole BCCI lobby is so influential, that it does not let your proposed law to be passed.
AM: Not only of BCCI, and in BCCI, not only the Congress, there are member of all parties, cutting across party lines, big leaders of all parties are in BCCI. And only Congress, even state chief ministers of the BJP write letters and saying that this law (proposed sports bill) should not be there.
PC: What law shouldn’t be there?
AM: The sports bill. They don’t want to have the sports federations under RTI. They don’t want players participation in organizing the players which we want to bring via the sports bill. They want to have a 70 year age limit
PC: You are talking of other sports bodies. Regarding cricket let me ask, why is the team known as India team and not BCCI’s team.
AM: It is India’s team, not BCCI’s. When they play, they move with the Indian flag. Hence, this is of India.
PC: But Indian laws are not applicable to them.
AM: Now via the sports bill we are planning to do this. They should not be answerable to the government, but the people of the country. Hence, the people of the country, demand information from them, because they are doing the biggest work of being a public authority by choosing a team, which will represent India. When they are choosing a team which represents India, then the people of the country have full right to know about the organisation which chooses a team for India.
PC: That is fine to know about how the finances are being used, but what about the health fitness issue?
AM: Financial, even administrative, how their elections are happening? Are they happening fine or no, financial matters, the money that is being earned, from where the money is coming, where it will be deployed, today there are enforcement directorate cases concerning IPL.
PC: But all the cricketing grounds given to IPL are of the government.
AM: Certainly. And through your medium I want to tell the people of the country that the sports ministry has submitted an affidavit in the Central Information Commission (CIC) in which we have told the CIC that they are a public authority and they should be under the ambit of RTI. We have also to them that they have got land free of cost in the country, be it state bodies or others. Secondly they have got income tax exemptions year 2006. Then exemption of entertainment tax, police,
PC: Ajay, bhai when you are saying so much, you also submitted information to CIC, then why as minister you failed get the bill passed.
AM: See the sports minister or any minister has to make a bill and take it to different stages. But I want to tell you not only Congress people, but many more BJP people who have interest are opposing the bill.
PC: But your cabinet ministers are against you.
AM: Even in BJP, if the BJP government comes, they will face the same opposition.
PC: But recently you meet the leaders in BCCI.
AM: I meet everybody.
PC: You met Sharad Pawar, Jaitley saab, did you get any assurance that your bill will be passed.
AM: I meet everybody because I want this bill to be passed. There were some issues, doubts that needed to be cleared.
PC: You stop playing, do teekhi baat now.
AM: I am not playing, If I would have been doing that, then I would have not been able to take this movement regarding sports federations, who are giving stiff resistance, to this level.
PC: You bill is still hanging; secondly you are saying that Suresh Kalmadi be removed, but are not able to do that.
AM: Tell me the law, tell me the law by basis of which I can get Kalmadi to step aside.
PC: In this country, can any jailed, charge sheeted, convicted man become the president of sports federation.
AM: You are right, he certainly can become. Hence, I am talking, I want to bring this law, the sports bill.
PC: Are sports bodies public bodies.
AM: Certainly, they are.
PC: In public bodies charge sheeted people cannot fight elections. This should happen isn’t it?
AM: This is what is there in the sports bill. These are the provisions of the sports bill, and hence all of them are against it. If they oppose me, and Prabhuji, if even you oppose me on Teekhi Baat then i..
PC: I am not opposing, I am saying why you cannot get it done, there is a government, but there is no power.
AM: Three four months ago, we had moved it in the cabinet. After moving it in the cabinet, some people raised valid questions. We don’t want to give the message that the government wants to take under its control, it is not a good thing to bring it under government control. But we also want, there should be transparency, hence we will rework the bill and table it in cabinet.
PC: Like you are saying ,there is opposition in your party.
AM: No.
PC: Is it not, Rajiv Shukla is going everywhere and.
AM: He is not a cabinet member.
PC: But he is in the minsiter’s group.
AM: He is not a cabinet, he does not sit in the cabinet.
PC: But he goes to everybody.
AM: He does not sit in the cabinet.
PC: He is the parliamentary affairs minister, he will have to lobby to get the bill passed. Jab ghar ka thanedaar na saath de aapka, to kya pakdenge aap kisiko.
AM: The thanedaar of Congress party and UPA government is Dr. Manmohan Singh and Shrimati Sonia Gandhi.
PC: Not thaanedar, they are IG police, DG. Am talking about thaanedar who are gate keepers, it does not seem that you have got the support of the whole Congress party as yet.
AM: Please see, I am a member of the Congress party and if I am working for the reforms I am doing by the medium of the Congress party. When as a member I have come this far, I have been able to do this as a representative of the Congress party.
PC: Tell me one thing, how much time limit you have to pass the bill.
AM: No time limit, by I will try, that in this budget session
PC: You will not surrender.
AM: I will not surrender.
PC: Either Ajay Maken will get the bill passed, or he will not be there.
AM: I will not surrender; I will take the bill ahead.
PC: Even if the parliament rejects it.
AM: Let’s see, I don’t hope the parliament will reject it. I parliament I have spoken to many MP’s, 95 per cent Member of Parliament tell me that the bill should certainly be passed.
PC: But tell me so many thousands of crores were invested in sports, there were many scandals also, last time also you told me that the utility of the sports stadiums will be increased, they all are lying in the same condition now.
AM: Now, you come with me, right now, in all stadiums, you will see 12,000 children playing in stadiums all over Delhi. 12,000 children are playing in the come and play scheme that we have started. In Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium Nagar there was a football match with Munich Wales with India here. South Asian Federation of football games happened here. Now hockey world cup qualifiers in national games will be held here. Before this Nehru cup and other games were held here. And in these sports facilities, by paying just Rs. 1000, any school, any sports federation of state can use this.
PC: It has been one year with you at the helm of affairs in the ministry, there are Olympics after six months, is India ready for it.
AM: We are spending Rs. 260 crores in this, 732 core probables we have finalised in last April, till November end we have spent Rs. 111 crore. Rs. 65 crore were spent on giving foreign exposure, we have deployed 39 foreign coaches. Besides this 125 …
PC: On what games are you preparing?
AM: We have identified 16 diciplines, we have found 732 core probables from these 16 diciplines. But now we have narrowed it down, we are asking the the qualifiers and the prospective medal winners what help do they what help in what manner. You will be surprised to know Poonia is playing and training in South Africa, before that she was in USA. All our shooters are training in Germany. Archery people are going to Korea. We have said wherever you want to go, our wrestlers are in USA at the moment, boxers will go to Kazhakistan. We are providing them the best facilities available in the world. This is unprecedented, has not happened till now.
PC: You will participate in Olympics.
AM: People are preparing.
PC: The Olympic association has taken an agenda, on behalf of the government too, since Dow is a sponsor, we will not go, not participate.
AM: We have said that keeping our protest on, and by doing a strong protest, there should be no name of Dow chemical’s at any place. Like Dow chemicals was putting its name on the ramp of the main stadium, later they also said no to it. Now as things come in front of us, and wherever we see the name of Dow chemicals, we will protest, tell them to remove the name.
PC: You will keep on protesting, but there is no chance of withdrawing.
AM: Presume if we are protesting and getting results too, then why should be fire keeping the gun on our sportsman’s shoulder. If Dow Chemicals has given sponsorship in London, then why should we fire keeping the gun on the shoulder of our sportsmen, rather, till the last moment we will see how much they listened to us and what decision we have to take. But at this moment, I don’t want to put a mental block in the minds of our players who are preparing for London Olympics. And let me also tell you, there should be no propaganda to the effect that, players and coaches get a doubt in their minds that will affect our preparations.
PC: Tell one, one year has passed, what have you gained and lost. What have you lost.
AM: opportunity, we put the sports bill forward, but could not get it cleared. What we gained is sending the sports bill again for inter ministerial consultation. We have gained that we have done unprecedented preparation for the London Olympics. What we gained is all the Commonwealth stadiums, and other stadiums in the country, we have started come and play, in Delhi alone ,12, 000 children have benefitted from this scheme. Hence, we have prepared to put systems in place.
PC: How much budget do you have, you don’t have much of it.
AM: In these things, we do not need to much budget.
PC: For making UID cards Rs. 8000 crore is given, you don’t get Rs. 800 crores for games.
AM: This I want to tell you, we don’t need too much budget, more than budget, there is a need to change the mindset
PC: Money is needed, in a country of one billion, to make a team.
AM: Like I said, the kind of money we are spending on preparation of Olympic games is unprecedented and there are many such countries…
PC: But it is still not as much as wanted..
AM: Whatever we for Olympics preparation we have got.
PC: Not Olympics, I am talking of sports budget
AM: We need sports budget, even if we demand too much, it will be less, to develop sports infrastructure in the country, at the low level. But let me tell you, sports is a state subject too. Hence, when sports is a state subject, hence we can create only elite infrastructure. Recently, for the national games, the Kerala government had a budget of Rs. 325 crores earlier, they said that they wanted Rs. 625 crore, we recommended Rs. 625 crores and sent it to the planning commission. If they would spend the money we gave to them by August, the Indian Government will given them Rs. 311 crore to Kerala government, in the same way, there were games in Jharkhand, we gave funds to the Jharkhand government. Games will be held in Goa, we will give funds to them. Hence, wherever games will be held..
PC: But what target have you set, how many medals will you gets in Olympics, ASIAD, do you have any target.
AM: Please see, we have made a target. Our first target is that our London Olympics qualifiers, last time only 57 of our people qualified, our efforts are there this time that at least 90-100 people of ours should qualify this time. If the numbers of qualifiers increase, then automatically the medal prospects increase.
PC: Other than sports, you had recently gone to Varanasi to release the Vision Document, don’t you think that people from outside are going and releasing vision document, but not the local leaders.
AM: See, that is not the case.
PC: Sam Pitroda went there and started talking that he is the son of a carpenter, don’t you think that this is a joke on the government.
AM: No, that is not the case, certainly it is not so.
PC: Sam Pitroda is talking of being a carpenter.
AM: I will tell you the reason of my going to Varanasi.
PC: Yes,
AM: Varanasi is an urban area, urban centre, am from Delhi and went there, I have told them to help in brining the Congress government there. We will make Varanasi a developed area like Delhi. I went to Varanasi, Mohan Prakash was with me, he was the president of Banaras Hindu University,
PC: That is fine, but by giving prominence to Delhi people , you were not able to create candidature of local leaders.
AM: All our candidates are local, then we have a government at the centre, we went there to give a message that we have a government at the centre,
PC: In Rahulji’s rally, young people went, who are less than 50 years in age. Do you think that if people there is loss, the youth will lose, if there is a win, then the youth will be the winner.
AM: There will certainly be victory. And under that , the whole party is working under Rahulji’s leadership.
PC: There is a fight of the youth there.
AM: If you think that, they let it be that, but we will win.
PC: Lets see, what happens, thank you for coming to our studio.
AM: Thank you, Prabhuji !
Monday, September 5, 2011
Race Course Road/The Sunday Standard/September 04, 2011
According to Parliamentary convention, MPs are not expected to read written speeches when they speak during Zero Hour. This healthy convention was established on the grounds that a written speech might reflect the mind of the person who wrote it, and not necessarily of the one who made it. They, however, are permitted to refer to published reports or other documents to bolster their arguments. Last week Rahul Gandhi made a spirited intervention, using written notes. He isn’t the only one. Many others including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and other opposition leaders come to the House with written speeches. In order to escape the charge of reading from a written speech, some tech-savvy parliamentarians have acquired the art of using their iPad 2-s to make their interventions. The Government recently provided them with state-of-the-art iPads. Earlier they were given laptops. Now, thanks to the new gadgets, our MPs can either write, or ask aides to vet their speeches in order to make the necessary impact.
Even though there is no vacancy for the post of the Prime Minister, many central BJP leaders have set their sights on 7 Race Course Road. They are holding special media briefings, distributing their Parliament speeches, even using YouTube to reach out to the social networks. Their pitch is not based on the support they enjoy in the party and among the cadres, but in the drawing rooms of Delhi’s chatteratti. Ignoring other party MPs, they are building bridges with smaller
parties. Their desperate urge to become prime minister even prevented them from taking up Narendra Modi’s cause as he had expected them to. Even the discussions held at the conclave of 60-odd Sangh Parivar leaders in Ujjain recently were twisted out of context to the advantage of an individual. According to Sangh sources, no views were expressed on who will be the party’s premier candidate for 2014. However, the media was misled that the choice was limited to three: L K Advani, Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj. It was left to BJP President Nitin Gadkari to set the record straight by making an unequivocal statement that the party doesn’t declare its candidate in advance. The internal power struggle was reflected in the conduct of BJP’s parliamentarians; its leadership was charged with adopting a soft line towards the Government because it wanted to project the image of being reasonable. But a determined group of Rajya Sabha MPs from Gujarat forced the leadership to go on the offensive against targeting the Gujarat chief minister. A weak Modi will never pose a threat to BJP’s central leadership. But a stronger Modi will leave them behind by miles. The Prime Minister is seriously concerned about what he considers a hostile media. The PMO is also baffled over formerly friendly media turning into a foe. The Cabinet Secretariat has done a study on the negative space given to the Prime Minister and the UPA during the last six months. Last week, an attempt was made to tame the press by invoking certain conditions imposed on TV channels while granting them licences. Some ministers suggested that the Prime Minister should appoint a Group of Ministers to devise a strategy to deal with recalcitrant media organisations. The Government is very much peeved with the 24X7 coverage given to the Anna agitation. A suggestion was made to evolve guidelines that would impose a time limit for the coverage of agitations. But the PMO resisted the idea as it would amount to censorship. Moreover, earlier experiments of fielding a Group of Ministers headed by the home minister to face the media had come a cropper in currying media favour. Most are reluctant to face the media and field questions on current affairs. Keeping in view the Congress’s history of taming the media, the Government may spring a surprise in one form or the other.
Monday, June 20, 2011
Race Course Rouad/The Sunday Standard/June 19, 2011
of the Kerala Planning Board with Cabinet rank. As Cabinet Secretary, he had pushed the Prime Minister’s economic reform agenda for four years. We expected Chandrasekhar to get a better posting, but he chose to settle for a post in his home state with massive clout and access to both the Central and State governments. Ever since the Deputy Chairperson of the Planning Commission acquired political authority, civil servants and academics have been lobbying hard to be appointed as members. The current Deputy Chairperson Montek Singh Ahluwalia’s enormous clout is the benchmark. Ahluwalia, who is the 24th Deputy Chairperson since Independence, will be breaking all records by completing a second term. He will be the first non-political person to stay in the job for a decade and also attend all Cabinet meetings as a special invitee. Barring three, all attendees are either planning ministers or politicians. Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee started the practice of inviting the Planning Commission Deputy Chairperson to Cabinet meetings—Jaswant Singh and then K C Pant. Both were former Cabinet ministers and Vajpayee sought their guidance. But neither enjoyed the influence over government policy that Montek does. The commission is flooded with former World Bank officials. It is the Planning Commission that has devised and framed policies that encourages an enhanced role for the private sector at the cost of the government. Private-Public Partnership in the social sector is the most favoured instrument to boost the private sector. Taking the cue from her husband, Isher Judge Ahluwalia had accepted the deputy chairpersonship of the Punjab Planning Board in 2005 when the Congress was in power. A couple of years later, N K Singh, her former finance ministry colleague, joined Nitish Kumar’s government as the Deputy Chairperson of the Bihar Planning Board. Since all Planning Board Deputy Chairpersons are expected to attend all meetings of the Planning Commission and the National Development Council held in Delhi, the emerging New Planners Club will soon become yet another non-elected parallel power centre dictating the economic agenda.
minorities and Naxalites. Now a bizarre but interesting explanation for this behaviour has surfaced which says that only Thakurs with Congress backgrounds have taken up cudgels on behalf of the minorities. Since they are obsessed by religious rituals and most follow a baba or a deity, Thakurs go out of their way to prove their secular credentials in the party. It began with Thakur leaders like V P Singh and Arjun Singh. Both chased and wooed the minorities. Even former Samajawadi Party leader Amar Singh made no bones about his passion for minorities. Arjun Singh converted his HRD ministry into a major source of funding for various minority institutions and NGOs who promoted his agenda. V P Singh lost his prime ministership but didn’t compromise on his love for minorities. In fact, he firmly believed that only an upper caste Hindu can win Muslim trust as they don’t have a national leader of their own. Diggy Raja, a distant relative of both Arjun Singh and V P Singh, perhaps believes that the minority plank is the only way to stage a comeback.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Snippets / Mail Today, June 14, 2010
So far, Nitish has done a fine balancing act as a secularist who finds nothing wrong in sharing power with the BJP. It may be recalled that during the last Lok Sabha elections, he campaigned for BJP candidates but made sure the minorities weren’t lost by keeping Modi away from poll platforms.
With Modi arriving in Patna for the NE, the expected and much worse has happened.
A public rally scheduled under the NDA banner with senior leaders such as L. K. Advani, Nitin Gadkari, Narendra Modi along with the fiery Varun participating ultimately became a BJP rally after Nitish refused to share the stage with Modi.
A dinner that Nitish had planned at his residence for all NE members was cancelled after Nitish made known his distaste for supping with Modi.
But the unseemly row touched a new low when Nitish objected to ads that the Gujarat government had taken out in Patna papers which had pictures of Modi and Nitish together and extolled the generous grants the Gujarat government had provided to Bihar after the 2008 Kosi floods. So offended was Nitish that he called it “ uncivilised” and threatened legal action against those behind the ad. He also said Bihar would return the money the Modi government had given.
The JD( U)- BJP alliance has been under strain for long.
And my instinct tells me it will not last long. Sooner or later, the BJP will decide to go on its own, knowing that in a polarised polity, Nitish will have to vie with Lalu Prasad and the Congress for the minority and backward votes while hoping to cash in on the rest.
The opposition within the council of ministers, however, came into the open only when minister of state for home affairs Ajay Maken wrote a letter to all young MPs cutting across party divisions, asking them to oppose the move. It was his contention that a caste- based headcount will trigger another aggressive and divisive agitation for enhancing reservations in government jobs and educational institutions, leaving the upper castes and even the meritorious among the poor with nothing but crumbs. The Prime Minister’s promise to take a serious look at the demand for a caste- based census was made merely to placate the powerful Yadav duo in return for their support to get cut motions moved by the BJP and the CPI( M) on the finance bill defeated.
Bizarrely, he did so just a few hours after home minister P. Chidambaram told Parliament about the inherent difficulties and dangers of holding such a census. It now appears that with the cut motion now out of the way, the government is having second thoughts and there are rumours that it was the party leadership that encouraged its Gen Next MPs to speak up. Now, with the massive divisions within the BJP also coming into the open, Gen Next seems to have won round one in dictating the political agenda.
At the age of 65, you’d expect him to look back in satisfaction at a long and distinguished innings and spend a quiet life in Chennai. But is the former governor — among the most activist that any Raj Bhavan has seen — missing the trappings of the gubernatorial mansion? His backers are doing the rounds in Delhi seeking another stint as governor for him, preferably in the Raj Bhavan in Panaji, Goa.
Gandhi has enough powerful backers in the government, yet there are hurdles.
The current incumbent in Goa is S. S. Sidhu, who is known to be close to the Gandhi family from the mid 1980s when he was the secretary in the civil aviation ministry and pilot- turnedpolitician Rajiv was the Prime Minister.
Monday, May 31, 2010
Power & Politics / Mail Today, May 31, 2010
MANMOHAN Singh must have known it was coming and it has come earlier than he expected.There have been deep divisions within the union cabinet before, but now for the first time, these are on public display.
Ministers of the pro and anti caste census lobbies appear at each other’s throat and neither wants to be the first to ease off. Three weeks ago, in its hurry to have the cut motions on the finance bills defeated in Parliament, the government struck private deals with some of the regressive opposition parties. I had in these columns said that the finance bill victory was likely to come with a heavy price tag.
That has happened much earlier than expected.
The divide in the party was evident early this month when barely hours after the Home Minister P Chidambaram told the Lok Sabha that he was against caste based enumeration as “ many members felt caste is a divisive factor”, the prime minister said his government would give it “ serious thought and take a decision shortly”. They were again in the open at last week’s Cabinet meeting where senior ministers like Chidambaram, Anand Sharma, Kapil Sibal and others clashed with those like Veerappa Moily who took up the cause. And now we have Ajay Maken writing an open letter to young MPs terming the caste census as a “ regressive measure”. Maken is not known for his flamboyance or is the kind to talk out of turn. As a junior minister, he has never joined debate on any political issue. That’s why his letter last week to young
and like- minded members of the Lok Sabha belonging to different political parties came as a surprise. His letter was sent out to 67 MPs aged between 25 and 45 years. They aren't ordinary MPs either. The recipients include Rahul Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav, son of Mulayam Singh, BJP MP Dushyant Singh, Ajit Singh's son Jayant Chowdhury, Union minister Dayanidhi Maran, Supriya Sule, Milind Deora and all young ministers in the government.
Being a very unlikely source for controversy, the question naturally arises: did Maken act on his own? Or was he speaking for the new Congress which has a stake in the future that its current leadership evidently doesn’t? I have known Ajay from the days he was a student leader at Delhi University and can say with a great degree of confidence that he is a stickler for rules. It was something of a sur- prise therefore to see him releasing his letter just a day after the prime minister warned the many warring members of his cabinet not to air their personal opinions in public and limit these to appropriate party forums. The issue must have been playing in mind for long, but the May 27 cabinet decision to appoint an Empowered Group of Ministers to decide about the timing and contours of the caste based census was the last straw. What now comes across loud and clear is that Maken was not speaking for himself alone. He represents the voice of GenNext who have been either kept away from the political decision making process or given such raw deals that they have chosen to stay away. It appears to me that they have decided to retaliate by working as a pressure group that will dictate political agenda from outside.
Arrayed against them is the entrenched Congress that continues to subscribe to the politics of convenience. Though the Congress party as a whole was opposed to the idea of caste based census, with their survival at stake, they unashamedly compromised with the Yadavs.
Now the liberal elements in the Congress have chosen to strike back. Historically, the Congress has always split into ideological factions every time a new emerging generation sought to assert itself. During the late 60s, it was the Syndicate vs Indicate represented by Indira Gandhi. In his short political career, Sanjay showed signs of raising an army to take on the old guard. Rajiv thundered about “ power brokers” and “ cabals” but fell victim to their machinations. The professorial Manmohan would be the last man you would expect to succumb to such low level politicking but even he chose the politics of convenience over conviction. Win is what counts, no matter what the cost of the trade- off is.
But the many young ones like Maken, who have a much longer political shelf life seem bent on setting the tone for future politics.
If Maken's voice is not muzzled by the Congress old guard, it will certainly signal the drawing of new battle lines. And Maken may have very powerful supporters within.