Monday, November 24, 2008

Seedhi Baat / Aajtak, November 23, 2008


Can't compare T20s with Tests: Ganguly

Cricketer Sourav Ganguly syas on Seedhi Baat a player has to display a lot of skills in Test cricket.


टीम इंडिया के सबसे सफल कप्‍तान रहे सौरव गांगुली ने संन्‍यास लेने के बाद की योजनाओं के बारे में बताया. सौरव अपनी कप्‍तानी में वर्ल्‍ड कप नहीं जीतने से निराश हैं. उन्‍होंने कहा कि इसका मुझे मलाल रहेगा.

Watch video: part 1; part 2; part 3; part 4; and part 5

Monday, November 17, 2008

Power & Politics / Mail Today, November 17, 2008

WITH THE economy slowing down, everything seems to have a “ For Sale” tag attached to it. But you wouldn’t expect our politicians to pin similar tags on election tickets, would you? You’d be wrong if you didn’t.


As Margaret Alva, the now resigned Congress General Secretary, then Yogendra Makwana, who was forced to step down as head of the Congress Scheduled Castes Cell and now Vishwendra Singh, the BJP MP from Bharatpur in Rajasthan, have all told us, India’s two largest parties are auctioning tickets to the highest bidder. If anything, this is further shameful proof that something is rotten in our political parties. Earlier, when Mayawati did it brazenly, nobody questioned her because she was the party and the BSP was Mayawati. But now we see the so- called national parties taking to the same “ cash for tickets” route. A cursory glance at the assets declared by those who control the national parties and those blessed with tickets by them makes it clear as daylight that India’s mainstream political parties are now becoming Of The Rich and For The Rich. And Run by the Rich.


I wish we had a parliamentary variation of the US system of primaries that throw up common party workers who rise to the top by sheer dint of hard work. We see, instead, parties that swear by democracy not holding genuine inner party elections, political thugs dictating terms to dedicated party workers and powerful cabals that have nothing to lose and everything to gain calling the shots.


Political gangsterism has overtaken the decision making process. You are an orphan in today’s politics if you don’t let your money do the talking. Why, you may not even find access to your own party leaders if they don’t have a clear idea of your bank balance. The irony is inescapable: we are a democracy and elect our MPs and MLAs. But our choice is truly limited, because the people whom we can vote for are decided by cabals in our political parties, which are increasingly run like family held companies. India Inc is being replicated on Political India.


All of them are equally culpable — Congress, BJP, BSP, SP. In my constituency in South Delhi, the BSP candidate is a gentleman whose chances of winning are just about as much as that of a snowfall in Delhi in the middle of June. Nobody had heard of him until last week when he rode an elephant ( his party symbol) and went to the ADM’s office to file his nomination papers. The secret was soon out: he had declared assets in excess of Rs 150 crores. Now I cannot think of even one party leader who would say no if the above worthy were to offer even a miniscule faction of that humongous wealth in exchange for a ticket. After all, top leaders need money to run their outfits and in these days when no leader worth his salt flies anything but charter and lives anything but fivestar, that kind of money goes a long way in keeping our leaders in luxury.

Seedhi Baath/ Aajtak, November 16, 2008

'Tulsi has left a lasting impression'

Actor and politician Smriti Zubin Irani says on on Seedhi Baat that the TV character of Tulsi has carved a respectable image for her.

आज तक के साप्‍ताहिक कार्यक्रम 'सीधी बात' में छोटे पर्दे की बहू स्‍मृति ईरानी ने कहा कि उन्‍होंने तुलसी के रूप में लोगों के बीच सबसे ज्‍यादा छाप छोड़ी है. हालांकि वो खुश हैं कि लोग उन्‍हें स्‍मृति ईरानी के रूप में भी जानते हैं.

Watch video: part 1; part 2; part 3; part 4; and part 5

Snippets / Mail Today, November 17, 2008

LAND PRICES may be crashing all across the country, but not in Tamil Nadu’s Tirunelveli and adjoining districts which of late are witness to land sharks from Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and other cities descending in droves, many of them either relatives or close associates of some union ministers.
The buzz is that several auxiliary units for the Kudankulam Atomic Power Project, that is to become operational next year, are to be set up in the area, for which thousands of acres need to be acquired. After the Nandigram and Singur fiascos, the DMK government has decided not to play middleman in deals involving villagers land. But there is no shortage of brokers. Every other revenue official or village officer in the district is ready to moonlight for the right consideration. Since the buyers are the well connected, the petty officials need have no fear of retribution.


Ring, ring... no one’s answering
THE STEEP drop in their net worth is not the only reason that some of India Inc’s leading lights are taking refuge on foreign shores. A lot of them have simply vamoosed because it is the election silly season when there is increased demand on their rapidly depleting resources from the political class. Desperate politicians who store the handset numbers of such honchos on their speed dials are alarmed at their frantic calls eliciting the standard monotone response: the number you are dialling is out of reach.
The rich and the powerful from Mumbai and Delhi have switched off their primary numbers and are using unlisted ones until elections are over and demand wanes. A conservative estimate would put the joint e
xpenditure of the Congress and the BJP in the five heartland states at about Rs 500 crore and high command leaders of both parties and even chief ministers of poll bound states are enlisting the support of the intelligence network to track down the traditional liberal donors. The only one unperturbed is Behen Mayawati who, like Barack Obama, accumulates her millions in small change.
Even in these bad times, the Congress is perhaps placed better than the BJP to collect money from states that are not poll bound. It has sought assistance of its chief ministers in the financial powerhouses of Maharashtra, Andhra and Haryana to mop up resources, but in the BJP, Narendra Modi, chief minister of Gujarat, arguably India’s fastest growing state, refuses to play ball, while BS Yedyurappa, a toddler still trying to find his feet, is wary of taking risks. It can at best bank on PK Dhumal in Himachal and Khanduri in Uttarakhand and there is not much that two of India’s smallest states can do to put a smile on the face of the saffronites. But they can take heart from the flip side. At least the rich donors won’t be able to claim ownership of the party.

PEOPLE have already lost confidence in politicians, but God forbid, is their cynicism now spreading to the judiciary? For years now, people kept faith in the judiciary and still continue to. Times are fast changing as cases pile up about the misdeeds of the men in black and there are rising demands that the judiciary clean the Augean stables. Fortunately, in K. G. Balakrishnan, the country has a chief justice who has heard these howls of protests and sent out the message that however high My Lords may consider themselves to be, they have to face the process of law.
The CBI and other investigative agencies are busy at work gathering information on the Ghaziabad Provident Fund Scam in which nearly three dozen judges, including one from the apex court and several from high courts and district courts across the country are under the scanner.
I am told that in a few days time, the CBI will hand over what they say is irrefutable evidence to the CJI for his perusal and whatever action he may choose to take. The heads of many sitting judges are expected to roll, several more retired ones will be shamed. The CJI has already won admiration for the manner in which he confronted tainted judges with evidence and forced some to resign though the obstinate ones are holding out. More power to his gavel.


CEC is the bugbear of the UPA
CONVENTIONAL wisdom suggests that the dates for the General Elections will be decided sometime in December after the results of the impending Assembly elections are known. Nothing could be more off the mark because there are other factors at work. True, Manmohan Singh wants to go in for early elections and Sonia Gandhi, Lalu Prasad, Sharad Pawar et al would rather wait till the last minute.
I have reason to believe that whichever way the results turn out next month, we may have to wait a couple of more months to know the schedule. The reason is a man who goes by the name of N. Gopalaswami. The Chief Election Commissioner has been the UPA government’s bugbear and in the three- man Commission, no member talks to another ( when they do, it is to agree to disagree).
The government is loath to go to the polls under Gopalaswami. The good news for the UPA is that he is due to retire on April 15. But the bad news is that the 15th Lok Sabha must be constituted by May, to enable which, the election process must start well in advance. Over- enthusiastic Congressmen are now mooting for the EC to be converted into a four- or five- member body where the extra seats will be filled up by loyalists who will not ask inconvenient questions.
One name being suggested is P. C. Haldar, the IB chief, who is to retire soon and who may be rewarded for past favours. Like the trust vote scam in July when Haldar’s inputs to his mentor, the National Security Advisor M. K. Narayanan, went a long way in making July 22, 2008, one of the most disgraceful days in Indian parliamentary history. In this season of cricketing cheer, who knows, the day will soon come when the EC has enough members to field its own Twenty20 team.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Sharad Pawar on Aajtak, November 10, 2008


"People do not support Raj Thackeray"

Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar says on Aajtak that people from different parts of India stay together in Mumbai as Mumbaikars.

Watch video: part 1; part 2; part 3; part 4; part 5 and part 6

Monday, November 10, 2008

Power & Politics / Mail Today, November 10, 2008

NEVER in recent times has the relationship between the government and Corporate India been as cosy as during the last four and half years of the UPA Government. It is easy to understand why business honchos prefer to be “ politically correct” and stay on the right side of the establishment. But with our politicians – both from the ruling combine and the Opposition – showing a tendency to openly wine and dine with industry titans, it almost seems as if the two are made for each other.

The once clear dividing line between that two has blurred to the point of extinction. In the past, the government occasionally wielded the stick at India Inc but it’s more standard practice on its part, business is seldom critical about the government. As a wag said, this is a government “ by business, of business and for business”. Don’t get me wrong, I am not against such interaction. In fact, I think open contact between the two is far more preferable to the practice during the command economy days when such meetings were mostly clandestine and little that transpired was above board. Of late however, while meetings have become transparent, they have also become too frequent for comfort. In any given month, the Prime Minister, his Cabinet colleagues and even the Leader of the Opposition are seen spending more time attending conferences organised by FICCI, CII, ASSOCHAM and other such bodies than attending party workers meetings.

Maybe it’s the ambience at such do’s or the fact that in these dangerous times, they feel more secure in the company of members of the billionaire club. With thousands of young men and women losing sleep worrying about losing their jobs, Manmohan Singh was absolutely right in calling the honchos last week and asking them to resist from retrenching workers. They in turn promised him they won’t. It’s a different matter that some of them left the meeting and headed for their boardrooms to discuss Q3 performance with senior managements and then went onto do exactly the opposite of what was promised to the PM. Manufacturing jobs are being lost as some of the biggest business houses either close plants entirely or factories are shuttered for a few days a month. Many Congress leaders I know are worried with this trend and frustrated at being unable to put their views across to the party top hierarchy.

And they are right to be worried. It is not their case that the Prime Minister and his Cabinet colleagues should not meet industrialists, it is just that they are concerned that the government is seen to be following a path which seems tailormade for the Singh: For business rich. Shades of 1996? Or Barack Obama 2008? The Bush administration policies that were seen to be benefiting fatcat corporates at the cost of welfare programmes for the large numbers of the poor was one reason for the resounding win of Barrack Obama.

Next week, Manmohan Singh flies to Washington for the G- 20 meeting hosted by President Bush. Reports say Obama may attend the meeting in which case, Manmohan should request Bush to arrange a meeting with the President- elect. Who knows, Obama may agree to share a few tips. In which case, we can all hope to see Manmohan returning with a spring in his step to tell his party colleagues: “ Yes We Can”.