Monday, September 17, 2012

Teekhi Baat with Yashwant Sinha/IBN7/September 15,2012

Interview with senior BJP leader and former union finance minister Yeshwant Sinha for Teekhi Baat on IBN7

PC: You do so much sweet talk, you must do some Teekhi Baat too. One does not whether BJP leaders are with the government or not. Who are you with?

YS: Don’t you know? You keep so much information about the BJP and are asking me?

PC: The BJP I knew, that BJP is over.

YS: You are being unfair to me

PC: When I read the standing committee, I felt that you want to help the government, unleash reforms, bring the insurance and other bills. When we follow speeches, we feel only Yeshwant Sinha wants the government to fall, all the others are hand in glove.

YS: You will have to see both the things in different light. The standing committee of parliament is an all party committee. In every standing committee, a member makes a point of view moving above the party and the political viewpoint. The whole committee felt that these decisions need to be taken to bring about an improvement in the economy. That report was made and presented before the parliament. And the political viewpoint that you are talking about, that differs from the committee’s point of view, in that I protest.

PC: You don’t do politics in committee, but outside you do

YS: This is a very good thing about the Indian democracy that commonly there is no politics in committees.

PC: The past session of parliament you did not let happen. But instead of constructive attitude, you attempt to cripple the government by opposing on every issue. Isn’t this is a result of shock that the party is in.

YS: I don’t know on what basis are you saying that what we decide in committee, we don’t support it in the house.

PC: When the parliament does not function, how would it happen?

YS: When parliament functions, it happens, this time it didn’t as 12-15 days the session did not happen

PC: The whole session was a washout

YS: No, even then, two bills were passed. I personally know that there was a consensus, and those two bills were passed.

PC: Those happened in the first two days

YS: No, not in the first two days, but amidst shouts and commotion. And we had no objections in those, hence we told the government that pass those

PC: The IIT one, AIIMS type institution, in which your states too were going to get benefit

YS: There were two. Regarding the working of the government, based on my knowledge I want to give two-three examples. This government brought direct access code bill, this was initiated when Chidambaram was finance minister, then it came to Pranab Mukherjee, he finalized it and presented it before the parliament, then it came to our committee, our committee gave a serious thought to it, gave its request to the house, and with satisfaction I want to tell that the requests, recommendations that we gave, were welcomed, that they were mature recommendations. After that it went to the government, the government put the GAAR chapter in the budget, which should not have been done, after that when Pranab Mukhrjee relinquished charge, Manmohan Singh came, formed Parsarthy Shome committee, that you look into the issue, then said to postpone it for three years. Now the incumbent finance minister saying that we will not implement the Direct Access Code bill from April 1, 2013, we postpone it. One example, when you presented the bill after putting thought to it, then what is the meaning of thinking two, three, four times. Second example is of land acquisition, it is very important, even that the government presented after putting a lot of thought to the issue, then it went to the standing committee, which gave its report, after that this government made GoM, the GoM’s request went to the cabinet, and five ministers of this government opposed the bill,

PC: What do you mean to say?

YS: I want to say that without thinking or understanding, as far as legislations are concerned, this government acts first, then starts thinking.

PC: Then it fails?

YS: Yes, that is why it is failing. In today’s time, there are 11 bills for which our standing committee has given its report, which are pending for eleven years, who is responsible?

PC: I understand what you are saying. The last session of budget did run, the one before that was a washout, every time it happens, like the prices of diesel was increased by Rs. 5, you party went behind them with a stick,

YS: Certainly

PC: But when you were the finance minister, you also increased the prices of fuel many times. 10-12 times you also increased. You are opposing everything but what would you have done in the current situation we are in

YS: I replied to such a question in the house too, because the Congressmen asked such a question. I said when we increased prices, did you welcome me on Vijay Chowk, garlanded me? What did you do? You used to with a garland of shoes on junctions,

PC: Tit for tat?

YS: Tit for tat will happen in today’s politics. Because even the Congress, the current Prime Minister is such a big economist, show me his one statement stating what Yeshwant Sinha did was right and we should not oppose.

PC: It shows behaviour revenge in you

YS: Then what behaviour are they showing, even today.

PC: They are running the government in today’s times

YS: No, they are running the government on the one side and attacking the Bharatiya Janta Party one the other. It seems as if we are in the government, and they are in opposition, and they are attacking, and we are less aggressive than them.

PC: Yeshwant Sinha, it is their job, they increased prices of diesel by Rs. 5, before that of petrol

YS: I will support today’s decision if Manmohan Singh stands up today and apologize to the nation that when NDA government had increased prices, and we opposed, then we had committed a mistake, today was request and apology for the same, let them do it

PC: You are opposing it politically

YS: Certainly. Politics will happen, what world do you live in? And I would like to tell you that in this country if you want consensus on issues of economic progress, then there should be one code of conduct for everybody. And not implemented for today, for the next two years, but for all the coming times. Let us sit down and work out that code of conduct.

PC: You are sitting and threatening the government, Yeshwant Sinha, who is listened to more these days than earlier times, that you will not let the government take any economic step, with a revengeful feeling

YS: No, I did not say this

PC: You said, politics, tit for tat?

YS: I said that they should look within, sir, out of the 65 years, we have been in government for only six years, all other times, these people were in power. Then they opposed us for six years. Today why do you expect that we will support them.

PC: In the country’s interest, you talk of nation’s interest

YS: Wasn’t it in the interest of the country then? When their time comes you will say let them go, when our times gives you will give us lessons in merit. I want the nation’s economic progress. I want to give you an example, their pension fund bill, which would not have been presented in the Lok Sabha, if the BJP would not have given immediate support. After that when Pranab Mukherjee was finance minister, he held discussions with us, we told them to accept some suggestions, he immediately agreed to those, even then who are holding those bills till today? These have been held by their own alliance partner Trinamool Congress, and then what should we do now?

PC: You are opposing FDI in retail

YS: We are opposing on grounds of principles.

PC: But it was tabled during your time

YS: Not in our time, during their time.

PC: You are opposing just to oppose

YS: FDI in retail is a big issue, hence cannot discuss it in full on Teekhi Baat

PC: I know it cannot be discussed in full

YS: FDI in retail is a big issue, and we have a principled opposition, that is why we are opposing.

PC: Prime Minister is an economist, why does he want to do FDI in retail, he is trying to build consensus for the past three years.

YS: This is the tragedy, that an economist Prime Minister cannot understand these simple things.

PC: You mean he didn’t study his economics right

YS: May be, he wouldn’t have

PC: What would you have done the kind of condition that is prevailing?

YS: This is not a hypothetical question for me, that what would I have done, if I had been.

PC: You should have an agenda to be one?

YS: We have an agenda and we have done it and shown. I have never said that what will I do when I will become finance minister, I was finance minister for five years of this country, and we have shown, and you have to remember that the current international situation that is prevailing, the situation was much more tougher when we had come to power.

PC: When you came for first time you came when Chandrashekhar was Prime Minister, you sold god

YS: We did not sell

PC: You mortgaged the country

YS: We saved the country, and proudly I want to tell, that people today realize that nation saving work that we did

PC: You don’t have any magic want, you yourself admitted that to doing political opposition, there is no merit based opposition.

YS: It is not so, you are putting words into my mouth. I want to make it clear, that when we took a step forward on the basis of merit. Then the Congress party, with Manmohan Singh, and other capable people, then used to continuously oppose us. If they accept their mistake, then we are ready to speak to them on merit.

PC: But it seems to me that you don’t want to debate because you don’t want to face the truth

YS: The debate that you are talking about

PC: Not only coal gate but everything.

YS: There has been a debate on every issue. I started a debate on inflation in Lok Sabha, not only discussion happened, but a proposal was passed, that the government would immediately take steps to control inflation. What happened to that? Sir, only the proposal was passed

PC: You have studied economics, also while preparing for IAS, have been finance minister, all over the world, the growth rate of inflation stops, but inflation keeps on happening. It is a natural process? 10 per cent, 9 per cent, 8 per cent, 6 per cent

YS: Sometimes 1, sometimes, 3,

PC: Yes

YS: It is essential .When you as what program do you have, if we want to improve the starting point of the economy, then the starting point should be inflation. If you cannot control inflation, you cannot control interest rate, if you cannot control interest rate, then there would be no investment, if investment will not happen, then there would be no goods coming to the market. If the good done come, then you again get stuck in a vicious cycle and the price of the goods would keep on increasing.

PC: The question is from 1991 to 1996, Narsimha Rao and Manmohan Singh started a reform process, not delving into whether it benefitted or not, but want to say that the Congress lost after that. You came to power, you kept continued, kept policies going. What happened in the country, from 1991 to 2012, the population of poor has increased. The rich population have become richer. The one with one aircraft has 20 now. The net worth of industrialist has risen from 1 billion dollars to 50 billion dollars. Dosen’t it seen that both the parties are responsible for making the rich, richer, and the poor, even poorer, policies of both the parties.

YS: We reject this charge,

PC: What happens in stock market, if it rises Yeshwant Sinha’s popularity rises, otherwise it comes down. Even P Chidambaram and Manmohan Singh see the stock market

YS: Stock market has to be seen and Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana should also be started. Who started Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana? Who introduced Kisan Credit Card ? If today, twelve crore farmer families have Kisan Credit Card, sir that work of the NDA government. If today the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana is reaching every village, that is our work. If we started the water shed mission, we started it so that the irrigation should spread across farms. We started to make godowns, so that farmers should benefit. We have taken a lot of steps for the farmers benefit.

PC: Even after that more farmers are committing suicide, irrigation is still inadequate, there is no rainfall and people are in trouble,

YS: If in six years, we would have solved all the problems of the world, then it would have been the end of history. One needs time, the work that has not been done in 40-45 years, it takes time to do that. It is not an easy issue

PC: You said you did lot of good work. Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana was most successful, a lot of roads were made, which were not made later after that. But even then, you lost two elections, one after the other, somewhere there is something amiss

YS: You have asked a very good question, let me supplement it, during Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee times, very good work did happen of building national highways.

PC: 11 km road per day average road was made

YS: Yes, after that start form West Bengal to Haryana, Punjab, I saw the figures, national highway number two, which is also known as Sher Shah Suri Marg, it had 14 such constituencies, in which Bharatiya Janta Party had won, in the 1998 elections, in the 2004 elections, we lost all those seats. Why? Road were made, it is not that the road wasn’t made, road was made, but the people did not link the road with the votes. This is a big question which you should think on that what you are saying is development, how much it affected voting during elections?

PC: Means development alone dosen’t work

YS: That has its own momentum,

PC: The slogan of development

YS: Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t.

PC: Let me come to coal gate, does corruption work then? You did not let the parliament function on the issue of coal gate. Many of your chief ministers are involved in that.

YS: You are saying wrong, totally. But I want to say that it is very difficult to say what works in elections. I have fought many elections, I don’t know how many have you contested

PC: Not even one, barring teacher association of Delhi University

YS: I have fought many elections, lost and won. And let me tell you it is very difficult to say what issue would work in which elections. And what issue will work where. Let me give you an example of Chattisgarh and Jharkhand, In Chattisgarh, we won 10 out of 11 seats in one election. In Jharkhand we lost 13 out of 14 seats. Both states are neighbouring, what was the air which was different in Jharkhand and different in Chattisgarh. Why? Because issues are different.

PC: I am coming to coal gate because, you politics changed so much ,you became negative, why did you run away in coal gate, Yeshwant Sinha is so aggressive normally in Lok Sabha, it seems that the villain of the show is Yeshwant Sinha, but you people are hand in glove.

YS: I dismiss the assertion that people are hand in glove. The allegation that you are levelling time and again is not right. The whole Bharatiya Janta Party fought on the issue of coal gate.

PC: In New Indian Express, we published a letter of Munda saab, that give a certain coal block to certain company, it was allotted in two days

YS: You are doing a big mistake, it is a duty of the chief minister of a state to request, the decision is to happen in the central government. When did we say that if somebody made a request that means that every request is wrong, I am saying it is a matter of investigation that which request was wrong and which was right. And today a CBI investigation is on because of the appeal made by two BJP MP’s, Prakash Javdekar and Hansraj Ahir, they first wrote a letter to CVC, and then CVC told the CBI to investigate. The investigation is happening because we demanded. If we had something to hide, would our two MP’s come ahead and demand an investigation. And today in the CBI investigation, the facts that are coming forward, layer by layer, who is getting exposed in that?

PC: Many Congress people names are coming, your number will also come?

YS: Let it come, we will see

PC: In spectrum Pramod Mahajan’s name is going to come, you are the one who was creating the most coming in JPC of 2G

YS: No name of his is going to come , don’t go by the newspapers. I am a member of the JPC, I know what the facts are. But today I am not in a position to reveal them. But I will tell you that we fear no investigation. In 2g, the scam happened form 2007-08, they said that they will investigate from 1998, we said do it. They said that they will investigate, allocation of coal blocks during NDA tenure, do it

PC: but this negative approach, in coal gate

YS: We are not negative,

PC: Then why don’t you do discussion in parliament

YS:We are doing discussion in Janta Ki Panchayat

PC: Janta ki Panchayat, then what is the Parliament for? Is the parliament there for making laws or not? You are elected ,Yeshwant Sinha has been elected by the people.

YS: Remember 2G, the winter session of 2010 was consumed by it, because we told the parliament to form a JPC, the government said they will not form. And the whole session went by.

PC: After that JPC was formed

YS: After that JPC was formed. Then who is responsible,

PC: But this time you have not made demand for JPC

YS: We are not demanding, because there is no meaning of JPC.

PC: Even JPC is political now

YS: It has become political, PAC has become political. The way of working of the Congress party, that is to engage in corruption and then to keep on denying it. Then if anybody is involved, keep on denying that too. Make attempts to save people till the end. And then create form problem in the investigation,

PC: Then why people, allies, don’t stand with you. During earlier times, a lot of people used to be with you. Why nobody is ready to stand by you? Has the BJP’s credibility gone so low,

YS: There is no loss of credibility sir, in the coming days, as we come near the elections, the issues will come forth. Why are you getting excited from now?

PC: At you place the discussion is who will become Prime Minister, and your allies say he will become Prime Minister, we will not let Modi become Prime Minister

YS: This should happen, it is a democratic country, there should be discussions held on every issue. And it is a very important issue, that who will be the BJP’s Prime Minister. And if we get a chance, a discussion should be held on that, the more the discussion, the better

PC: Nitish Kumar says, you deputy chief minister there says.

YS: It is no decision, it is discussion. When the time comes, a decision would be taken.

PC: At your place the fight is over people, not ideological.

YS: Whatever is happening now, all is in the realm of discussion, when the right time comes, decision would be taken.

PC: What is the party ideology, should the party’s prime ministerial candidate be announced in time or not

YS: That would be decided when the time comes.

PC: Why do you feel

YS: I don’t feel anything.

PC: You name is not coming anywhere

YS: How would my name come, I am a ordinary party worker. Ordinary Member of Parliament, won only three times, and what experience do I have? Only of finance and external ministry, some of government service, then how somebody like me can become Prime Minister of this country

PC: You are very active these days, you have started doing press conferences, do you think session would run in future.

YS: Which

PC: The coming session

YS: When the next session comes, we will announce our strategy, at appropriate time

PC: Which means this strategy was limited to this session

YS: Daily strategy is decided.

PC: You said that your demand stands till the Prime Minister does not resign

YS: Please listen, our leader of opposition in Lok Sabha said, she tried to find a way out,

PC: To listen to two conditions

YS: But the government did not listen. Who is responsible then?

PC: The two conditions were to cancel allocation the other was to enquiry under Judge, till the next session many would be cancelled

YS: Let see what happens.

PC: Now Prime Minister’s resignation is no condition

YS: Certainly, it is a condition, we have never left it. But the discussion that the parliament should function, parliament should function in what condition; we said that do this, then the session would run. We will demand this to the Prime Minister

PC: Last question, you have been finance minister, the incumbent Prime Minister has been finance minister and Prime Minister, if you have to give a brief about the today’s economic policy and politics, what would that be?

YS: I will say that to run the economic policy, a leadership is needed, a strong leadership, which is lacking heavily in this government.

PC: And politics

YS: There is no politics, Prime Minister is not a politician.

PC: Do you have leaders as alternative

YS: Many are there.

PC:You have economic policy and leader

YS: Yes.

PC: Let see what in store in future. Thank you for coming to our studio.

YS: Thank you, Prabhuji !

No comments: